|
AQM-91A Compass Arrow |
||||
Review by
Al Magnus
- one72guy(at)gmail(dot)com
|
Both halves require a fair bit of sanding along the seam before joining them. Because the one side was warped I could not use my usual method of sanding against a piece of sandpaper mounted on a flat piece of wood - so my sanding was performed freehand. Once I was happy that further sanding would be pointless the two halves were joined with thin super glue. Once the glue set I turned my attention to the seams. The seams were very prominent and needed a lot of filling. My filler of choice is super glue with baking soda. One nice thing about using super glue for filling is that it gives much added strength to the model. The next item to address was the shape of the fuselage around the jet intake and exhaust. Referring to photos, the kit's lack of accuracy was obvious. The face of the jet intake needs to have a definite forward jut, and the fuselage profile near the exhaust is completely wrong. I first tackled the intake changes, which I thought would be the more difficult fix. The intake was built up using plastic strip. I started by adding a straight section to the bottom face of the intake. Then another straight piece was bent and spot glued around the curved portion of the intake. The pieces of strip were cut to length and the whole area between them and the resin was filled and sanded. The rear fuselage around the exhaust was next. The kit's casting is an unbroken slope from the jet exhaust to the rear tip of the fuselage. Photographs show that this area has a step. Using a pencil, I marked the spots that required removal, and then cut them away with a saw. The resin was thick enough here that I did not need to fill any gaps afterward and sanding was done to get the shape into its final form. Next I turned my attention to the flying surfaces and their incorrect airfoil. The only remedy, without making replacements, was to use some sandpaper and reshape the leading edges. Because I had a fair amount of resin to remove I used coarse sandpaper for the heavy work and finished with fine paper to get a smooth surface. Not onerous work but annoying nonetheless. I also tried to fill any air bubbles I could find and I sanded out the wave in the wing surfaces. It was easier to do all of this before the wings were added to the fuselage. Once the flying surfaces were complete I mounted the wings and sanded down the large step between them and the fuselage fillets. Next were the horizontal stabilizers and fins. I spent quite some time on sanding the mating surface so that I would not have a lot of filling to do on the seam between them and the fuselage. Before the primer coat the kit received an overall sanding and a soapy wash to remove particles to get it as smooth as possible before painting. Unfortunately the sanding opened up some subsurface air bubbles and these had to be filled. Another light sanding was done, followed by another wash to remove particles, and yet more bubbles were discovered. After a couple more sanding, filling and washing tries it was becoming apparent that I was never going to get them all filled, for it seemed that each time I sanded I exposed more bubbles than I had eliminated with the previous filling. Eventually I came to the inevitable conclusion that this was looking more and more likely to be a never ending process of filling, sanding and washing and I was never going to get to the painting stage, and this build has now been cancelled after a couple of years of off and on work. Conclusion So all in all, don't even consider building this kit unless you are willing to put a lot of work into it. This in not a kit for those wanting a quick and easy build, let alone an accurate build. There are some serious issues with the shape that need to be corrected, and the resin needs a lot of preparation to get an acceptable finish. Since it is unlikely that the AQM-91 will be produced as an injected plastic kit, those wanting to add an AQM-91 to their collection, this A+V version will probably be the only game in town. For another view on the inaccuracies and difficulties with this kit, visit Rob de Bie's site to see the extensive changes he has performed. He is a much braver and talented man than me! |
Review Last Updated: 14 July 2019
|